• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Duffy Law Office, PLLC

Helping Families Preserve Their Wealth

  • Home
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • About The American Academy
    • Advantages of Working With Our Firm
    • Attorney and Staff Profiles
    • Speaker Connection
  • Services
    • Asset Protection & Business Planning
    • Elder Law & Medicaid Services
    • Estate and Gift Tax Figures
    • Estate Planning Services
    • Family-Owned Businesses & Farms
    • Financial Planning Assistance
    • Incapacity Planning
    • IRA & Retirement Planning
    • LGBTQ Estate Planning
    • SECURE Act
    • Special Needs Planning
    • Trust Administration & Probate
  • Reports
    • Advanced Estate Planning
    • Basic Estate Planning
    • Estate Planning For Niches
    • Trust Administration
  • Resources
    • Client Resources
    • Consumer Resources
    • Published Books
  • BLOG
  • Contact Us
  • (563) 445-7400
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Arguments Being Presented to Supreme Court in Estate Tax Case

Ryan Denman · Apr 20, 2013 ·

There is an unlimited marital federal estate tax exemption, so a surviving spouse can inherit any amount of money from his or her deceased spouse without incurring any estate tax liability.

Same-sex marriages are legal in several of the states and in some foreign countries. However, if an American taxpayer is legally married to someone of the same sex the federal government won’t recognize the marriage. This is because of provisions contained within Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act.

Section 3 defines marriage as something that can only take place between a man and a woman.

In 2009 a woman named Thea Spyer  passed away, leaving a considerable amount of money to her partner Edith Windsor. The two women were legally married in Canada after spending some four decades together as a couple.

The federal government imposed an estate tax levy exceeding $360,000 on this asset transfer. Edith Windsor filed suit, contending that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional.

The first court to hear the case agreed with Windsor, and the Court of Appeals agreed as well, and they ordered a refund of the tax levy.

Now the case has been escalated all the way to the highest court in the land. The United States Supreme Court is hearing arguments in this case at the time of this writing.

If the Court finds in favor of Windsor the playing field will be considerably altered for affluent gay couples who are engaged in the process of estate planning. We will continue to follow this case, and when a decision is rendered we will examine its impact.

 

  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Ryan Denman
Latest posts by Ryan Denman (see all)
  • Who Can Act as a Living Trust Trustee? - December 14, 2016
  • Attend a FreeEstate Planning Seminar - December 14, 2016
  • Can Medicaid Take My Home? - August 19, 2014

Estate Planning, GLBT, Taxes Estate Planning, estate tax, GLBT Planning

Blog Subscription

Where we are

Duffy Law Office, PLLC
1840 E 54th St
Davenport, IA 52807
United States (US)
Phone: (563) 445-7400

Opening hours

Monday8:30 AM - 4:30 PM
Tuesday8:30 AM - 4:30 PM
Wednesday8:30 AM - 4:30 PM
Thursday8:30 AM - 4:30 PM

Map

duffy_hmpg_map.png

© 2023 · American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, Inc. | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Contact Us