• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Duffy Law Office, PLLC

Helping Families Preserve Their Wealth

  • Home
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • About The American Academy
    • Advantages of Working With Our Firm
    • Attorney and Staff Profiles
    • Speaker Connection
  • Services
    • Asset Protection & Business Planning
    • Elder Law & Medicaid Services
    • Estate and Gift Tax Figures
    • Estate Planning Services
    • Family-Owned Businesses & Farms
    • Financial Planning Assistance
    • Incapacity Planning
    • IRA & Retirement Planning
    • LGBTQ Estate Planning
    • SECURE Act
    • Special Needs Planning
    • Trust Administration & Probate
  • Reports
    • Advanced Estate Planning
    • Basic Estate Planning
    • Estate Planning For Niches
    • Trust Administration
  • Resources
    • Client Resources
    • Consumer Resources
    • Published Books
  • BLOG
  • Contact Us
  • (563) 445-7400
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Estate Planning News: DOMA Provision Declared Unconstitutional

Dennis D. Duffy · Jul 29, 2013 ·

Many people within the estate planning community have been anxiously awaiting the Supreme Court decision on the question of whether or not the federal government should recognize same-sex marriages.

Why is this relevant to the field of estate planning? One of the reasons is actually at the core of the legal action that set this case in motion.

Thea Spyer and Edith Windsor got married in Canada in 2007 after being together for many years. Spyer died in 2009 and left her spouse an inheritance as you might imagine. It exceeded the amount of the estate tax exclusion, and the federal government imposed the estate tax.

There is an unlimited estate tax marital deduction in the United States. You can leave any amount of money to your spouse free of the estate tax. While you are alive you can transfer any amount of money to your spouse free of the gift tax.

Even though Spyer and Windsor had gotten married in a jurisdiction that allowed it the estate tax was still levied because of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act that defines marriage as something that can only exist between a man and a woman.

Windsor questioned the constitutionality of this provision, and after a lower court found in her favor the matter made its way to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court has in fact found in favor of Windsor as well. Going forward each state will have the right to decide whether or not same-sex marriages will be sanctioned. Marriages that have been legally entered into in a given state will be recognized by the federal government.

We are grateful you follow us and value your comments and input. You Can Also Find Us Online: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedInThanks again.

Ryan M. DenmanandDennis D. Duffy

Duffy Law Office, PLLC

 

  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Dennis D. Duffy
Latest posts by Dennis D. Duffy (see all)
  • Attorneys Want to Help - December 14, 2016
  • Trusts and the Estate Tax - December 14, 2016
  • What Is a Third Party Special Needs Trust? - December 14, 2016

Estate Planning, GLBT Supreme Court DOMA Ruling

Blog Subscription

Where we are

Duffy Law Office, PLLC
1840 E 54th St
Davenport, IA 52807
United States (US)
Phone: (563) 445-7400

Opening hours

Monday8:30 AM - 4:30 PM
Tuesday8:30 AM - 4:30 PM
Wednesday8:30 AM - 4:30 PM
Thursday8:30 AM - 4:30 PM

Map

duffy_hmpg_map.png

© 2023 · American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, Inc. | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Contact Us